Shahar Peer vs Karolina Sprem Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L W W L L L
Form
W W L W L W L L L LHead-To-Head: Peer 2 - 0 Sprem
They have played 4 sets in total, with Peer winning 4 and Sprem winning 0. The last match between Peer and Sprem was at the Open Gaz De France - Paris, 11-02-2010, Second, I.hard with Shahar Peer getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Shahar Peer | 2 |
| Karolina Sprem | 0 |
Open Gaz De France - Paris(11-02-2010)
6
4
6
3
| Peer | Stats | Sprem |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 11 | Highest Rank | 17 |
| 37 | Age | 40 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 7 |
| 58% (388-277) | Career Total W/L | 59% (220-156) |
| $2,894,734 | Career Prize Money | $334,785 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kenin VS Sun PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Korda VS Cina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Shahar Peer
Player
Karolina Sprem
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 7-5 6-3 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 15 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 71% (47/66) | 1st Serve % | 66% (31/47) |
| 70% (33/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 81% (25/31) |
| 68% (13/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (7/16) |
| 100% (2/2) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 32% (15/47) | Return Points Win % | 30% (20/66) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shahar Peer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paula Cristina Goncalves
Player
Shahar Peer
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Kateryna Volodko
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Valeria Gorlats
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
33%
(
19 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Ipek Soylu
Player
Shahar Peer
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
1
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
4
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristyna Pliskova
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
12
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
3
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jana Cepelova
Player
Shahar Peer
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Shahar Peer
74%
(
62 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
10
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Glushko
Player
Shahar Peer
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Karolina Sprem Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-7(2) 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Heather Watson
Player
Karolina Sprem
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
47%
(
24 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
56
Total Points Won
49
|
1-6 6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chanelle Scheepers
Player
Karolina Sprem
77%
(
63 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
98)
0
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
11
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
14 of
45)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova
Player
Karolina Sprem
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Karolina Sprem
Player
Christina Mchale
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
3
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
5
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Anna Tatishvili
Player
Karolina Sprem
66%
(
75 of
113)
1st Serve %
43%
(
43 of
99)
0
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
8
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
43%
(
49 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
107
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Karolina Sprem
Player
Misaki Doi
53%
(
63 of
118)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
3
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
3
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
42%
(
23 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
48 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
113
Total Points Won
107
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(6) 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (388/277) | Win/Loss | 59% (220/156) |
| 56% (855/668) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (503/373) |
| 52% (7235/6580) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4268/3788) |
| 60% (247/165) | Hard Win/Loss | 44% (40/51) |
| 58% (84/62) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (90/58) |
| 59% (39/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (77/36) |
| 44% (18/23) | Grass Win/Loss | 54% (13/11) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 551 | Aces Total | 519 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1575 | Total Double Faults | 806 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 498.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 480.56 |
| 65% (21212/32646) | 1st Serve % | 53% (5610/10494) |
| 61% (12882/21212) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (3718/5610) |
| 44% (5081/11441) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2234/4889) |
| 48% (2024/4236) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (557/1221) |
| 46% (15135/32818) | Return Points Win % | 43% (4451/10268) |
| 57% (60/45) | Slam W/L | 43% (20/26) |
| 55% (85/70) | Masters W/L | 50% (34/34) |
| 62% (21/13) | Cups W/L | 55% (6/5) |
| 59% (189/129) | Main Tour W/L | 57% (104/78) |
| 62% (33/20) | Challenger W/L | 82% (56/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 58% (384/659) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (218/372) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 57% (71/125) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (37/65) |
| 58% (114/195) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (61/124) |
| 87% (370/321) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (227/189) |
| 13% (370/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (227/38) |
| 23% (295/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (149/31) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
